Post by researchhound on Aug 28, 2019 2:09:40 GMT
Okay so ironically my mom and I have discussed this podcast thoroughly. We’ve analyzed a lot of the tidbits of this case. I am a student and just about to get my degree in intelligence and Data Analysis. I’ve studied deception but feel I’ve just barely scratched the surface. What I have learned is that it is what you don’t say that says everything.
This is long and hopefully not too wordy.
In trying to get my point across I’m going to bring up another true crime incident where a man reported his sister and niece missing. The police found his sister who had been killed but his niece was found alive. He stated repeatedly that this was both the worst day and the best day. He grieved the loss of his sister but rejoiced over saving his niece. Such mixed emotions and he expressed that.
Go to Angel. Her narrative about a gunman “opening fire” which is echoed through others who have recounted the story because that’s her verbiage of choice. She tells about when she has been taken to the hospital and she is told her husband did not make it.
I have watched that part of the video several times.
What she *forgot* in her narrative is that she was supposed to also be uncertain about the fate of her child who was also in the house. Whoops! She mentions her sorrow but does not include in her narrative like the brother I mentioned above that her child survived. It would have been both the worst day and the best day like the guy I referenced.
The reason is that the rehearsed portion of her plan failed to include that she would also be uncertain about the fate of her child. Huge point.
Next, the mom- Brenda. What little we know is that the one consistent act of the mom is to insert herself in situations and play martyr or hero. She seems to need to be needed. Did the mom know something was going down? Yes. Maybe she helped. Or, more consistent with her personality, she knew something was going down and she was going to be the hero or martyr for her daughter and grandchildren. Maybe that’s why she was in the driveway. She just couldn’t let this all go down without needing to be there and exerting some control.
I am currently thinking that Angel let the killers in. They did the murder. They left. Angel leaves with the baby because she has certainty that her other child was safe and sleeping. She could take her child across the street and call 911. I think the house across the street was chosen for a reason. I think the plan was for police to go in and get the baby and Brenda intended to be there to save the grandchildren.
I think it threw a wrench in the plan for the police to use hostage protocol. Angel assumed the police would get the child and give her to the mom so she went ahead and left for the hospital waiting to be told that her husband was dead. Angel exhibits that she had CERTAINTY the child was fine since she never mentions the hell of not knowing if your baby was killed by the home invaders.
AHA!!!
I can imagine that Brenda’s self talk would be something to the degree of keeping her daughter out of trouble for the sake of her grandchildren. In her twisted reality she felt noble perhaps.
This explains why Brenda cleaned the house. It is consistent with her frame of mind - clean up the messes of her daughter and be the rescuer. I think that also tells us why she was at the house the night of the murder. The underlying reasons are the same.
Whether she got milk or didn’t get milk, I think that she purposely inserted herself and she had to have known of the plan that her grandchildren wouldn’t have a father when the sun came up.
I believe Angel is the master mind. Brenda is an accessory. There are 2 killers and I think Angel arranged their entry and exit. She was way too certain and too many things she forgot to include in her narrative.
That’s my theory today anyways.
This is long and hopefully not too wordy.
In trying to get my point across I’m going to bring up another true crime incident where a man reported his sister and niece missing. The police found his sister who had been killed but his niece was found alive. He stated repeatedly that this was both the worst day and the best day. He grieved the loss of his sister but rejoiced over saving his niece. Such mixed emotions and he expressed that.
Go to Angel. Her narrative about a gunman “opening fire” which is echoed through others who have recounted the story because that’s her verbiage of choice. She tells about when she has been taken to the hospital and she is told her husband did not make it.
I have watched that part of the video several times.
What she *forgot* in her narrative is that she was supposed to also be uncertain about the fate of her child who was also in the house. Whoops! She mentions her sorrow but does not include in her narrative like the brother I mentioned above that her child survived. It would have been both the worst day and the best day like the guy I referenced.
The reason is that the rehearsed portion of her plan failed to include that she would also be uncertain about the fate of her child. Huge point.
Next, the mom- Brenda. What little we know is that the one consistent act of the mom is to insert herself in situations and play martyr or hero. She seems to need to be needed. Did the mom know something was going down? Yes. Maybe she helped. Or, more consistent with her personality, she knew something was going down and she was going to be the hero or martyr for her daughter and grandchildren. Maybe that’s why she was in the driveway. She just couldn’t let this all go down without needing to be there and exerting some control.
I am currently thinking that Angel let the killers in. They did the murder. They left. Angel leaves with the baby because she has certainty that her other child was safe and sleeping. She could take her child across the street and call 911. I think the house across the street was chosen for a reason. I think the plan was for police to go in and get the baby and Brenda intended to be there to save the grandchildren.
I think it threw a wrench in the plan for the police to use hostage protocol. Angel assumed the police would get the child and give her to the mom so she went ahead and left for the hospital waiting to be told that her husband was dead. Angel exhibits that she had CERTAINTY the child was fine since she never mentions the hell of not knowing if your baby was killed by the home invaders.
AHA!!!
I can imagine that Brenda’s self talk would be something to the degree of keeping her daughter out of trouble for the sake of her grandchildren. In her twisted reality she felt noble perhaps.
This explains why Brenda cleaned the house. It is consistent with her frame of mind - clean up the messes of her daughter and be the rescuer. I think that also tells us why she was at the house the night of the murder. The underlying reasons are the same.
Whether she got milk or didn’t get milk, I think that she purposely inserted herself and she had to have known of the plan that her grandchildren wouldn’t have a father when the sun came up.
I believe Angel is the master mind. Brenda is an accessory. There are 2 killers and I think Angel arranged their entry and exit. She was way too certain and too many things she forgot to include in her narrative.
That’s my theory today anyways.